Agree with most points. I'm confused with the "porosity" number. The 6% porosity is conventional - ie attributable to pores. But there is talk of "fracture" porosity, (referred to as bimodal) ie porosity attributable to fractures. Im not sure there's an estimate for this parameter.
Furthermore, idk whether the net 40m approx of gas only covers coentional porosity (I suspect it does) in which case, there is a fracture porosity that needs to be computed for the entire gas saturated thickness...of 200 odd metres...thusfar . It is for this reason I suspect they are running logs, and this is the best time to do it, as formation damage would be at a minimum.
im not sure many truly understand this potential for huge upside. It's a bit like having natural fraccs.
Ann: West Erregulla Update, page-45
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 57 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
23.0¢ |
Change
0.005(2.22%) |
Mkt cap ! $657.9M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 22.5¢ | 23.0¢ | 22.3¢ | $1.988M | 8.774M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 522260 | 22.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 23.0¢ | 524269 | 8 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 05/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STX (ASX) Chart |