Same geology and rocks as WCN, same exploration history by previous explorers, dealing with the same local stakeholders and same logistics so quite comparable to WCN.
I think obviously, besides the geological factors of having or not having an obviously high-grade orebody, the difference could be in management. Here at SMM - I assume this is the same Chis Hansen who was at TMR (Tempest)? Interesting that the re-processing of the 1968 IP was possible and they seem fairly keen on it.
Same geology and rocks as WCN, same exploration history by...
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.1¢ |
Change
-0.002(6.67%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.877M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.2¢ | 2.2¢ | 2.1¢ | $59.41K | 2.780M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 3372256 | 2.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2¢ | 420000 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 13/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SMM (ASX) Chart |