Originally posted by kcheers:
↑
mmmm, and you say it plays out like a theater?? Your indicating or placing me in the D ramp bracket? You have too may buckets?agendas and just because its got you confused, you go off on all tangents to justify. i desire WFI to succeed just as much as you. However the way I was raised means i wont communicate in a way that is hypocritical. So i have no agendas but to profit.... but not gains by misleading. A spade is a spade and not the jack right. I really think you need to get over your obsession with Oz and move on. By all means, challenge him on his points. But many dont read well and seem to misunderstand and I can tell you there is quite a few none commenters that find it entertaining and ridiculous how the misunderstandings go. Please keep it all in context. For me, im using points raised by neg nellies of respect to make points for JB. im long awaiting some responses and thats not necessarily positive. he is a busy man and I respect that, but I would love some questions answered and I do understand some can and cant be for market disclosure. But with these concerns from all people, this raises a valued list of points that hopefully will be covered in the prospectus. See, i was taught in sales that you answer the objections before they are raised, you contemplate the objections that could be used to halt the same and you deal with them before the buyer has thought of it. With that analogy, i believe its positive for all inc the BOD so as to get the very best prospectus with no holes. If there are holes then the likes of Oz will find them and put a weighting on it. Is that bad? Not in my opinion, but it makes me more wary and cautious. So its a good thing. People like Oz could very well be inclined to buy in at some point and these people dont usually buy on open but wait for it to settle in a range, but then there demand helps support the SP. We should be on the same page, my thoughts are that this is JB's best interest long term and I have had discussions on this topic with him. I have noted how well he has net worked and achieved what big corporate often cannot. This would tend to lead to a thought that he has strong ethics and values a hand shake; and friendship. So i think his network is strong and based on much more then a legal agreement here and there. He cant walk away from that in the medium term and the locals will have sadness if he stepped away and didnt lead WFE. I feel the trust is there and their future is quite relevant to our success. Thats a win win all around.
Expand
I’m not confused at all so I’m not sure why you are inferring such a point. If there is an obsession here it’s your obsession to continually and relentlessly bat for someone who won’t even bat for themselves..Go figure!
Go back and read the company announcements in conjunction with Ozblue posts and tell me the statements made and challenging bullish views made any sense whatsoever? I dare you!
Meanwhile we wait for the prospectus. But yes agreed we are all here to make money only some play a little unfair. BTW I see you posted Oz opinion he will look at the prospectus when it comes out decide then whether to invest, did you make that up or are you relaying his investment position? Probably best to change the subject don’t you think?