The naming conventions for the holes can be confusing to the...

The naming conventions for the holes can be confusing to the naked eye - I presume you’re referring to MRC09 from this https://wcsecure.weblink.com.au/pdf/WMG/02496146.pdf which is sitting southwest of the Tank, further away from current EIS 3 focus? This appears to be different to MTRC09, which is nearer to current hole in progress

But great point nonetheless regarding high grade strikes not too far from surface. Would be good to read any oblique-to-the-drill hole remarks for this historical hole!

Whilst the in-ground value improves with richer strikes deeper in the Tank, I presume the modelling across top 300m is where the economic value will be worked out from? (Based on what is known so far as well as current nickel macro picture). Locating the source underneath and lateral extent of higher grade mineralisation at depth will increase life and economic value of any open pit mine.