I've heard this land area comparison with LKE a couple of times,...

I've heard this land area comparison with LKE a couple of times, keen for some clarification.

My assumption is that the total size of our respective land holdings does not directly relate to the resource size. I.e. different tenements hold different levels of resource value. Given our land holdings are in direct proximity to LKEs highly prospective Kachi project, our resource could be of similar value to theirs.

As per their website: "Kachi comprises 705 sq km of leases and lease applications over a brine-bearing basin 20km long, 15km wide, and 400-800m deep centred."

As you can see, most of the resource value sits in that small basin. We are yet to quantify our resource value, but am I right to assume it could be less, equal to, or even more the LKE? And not to be compared to theirs based on land holding comparisons.