Furthermore, in forms filed with the Texas Railroad Commission, Petrohawk’s Donnell 366 No. 1H was expected to be flowing in to a sales line on 19 August 2009 at a condensate rate of greater than 600 bbls/d.
what forms?
i cant locate anything.. and i have looked long and hard
can anyone else confirm that this part of the release from AZZ is factual and maybe enlighten as to what form was posted on the rrc site by petrohawk??
the flow rate if its a long term rate of greater than 600 bopd would mean the well is also producing more than 6 mmcfpd sustained flow.. i like those numbers myself, but i dont believe flow rates until i see sustained rates. petrohawk pride themselves in not releasing IP flow rates on any wells in the eagleford, they want to release only the factual flow rates after a long term test.. i would hate to see ip's being bantered around on the eagleford with the petrohawk name attached just as they would, its just not how it should be done..
looking good if the flow rate is correct here imho, that type of flow is going to excite a lot of people out there chasing this play
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?