And that's the point of qualifying what I say. I didn't have the...

And that's the point of qualifying what I say. I didn't have the facts in front of me. The guy that asked questions about the status of the whetstone case was who I was responding to. I threw in my own POV because I'm entitled to. If you disagree with what I said by all means say your piece but I mentioned my recollection because I thought that might prompt someone to revisit the announcement and confirm or deny my suspicion about the 31 Jan deadline. In other words, I was hoping to advance the discussion on this whetstone issue which I must say, I have been very impressed with the contributions and the efforts of posters digging around to fill in the gaps. After all, if we can't do that, what's the point of the forum?