Ann: Yowie Launch Social Media Advertising Campaign in US, page-35

If the details in this article put up by jwest  ( thanks) are correct then YOW has a problem.

I don't know enough to understand how after a ruling was made that YOW put up 900k that Whetsone can simply put up $562K and stop it being recovered?   If as per the article the $562k put up as surety with the court is Hanks then YOW are yet to put up anything?
YOW may be sitting on their hands deciding if they want the machine if they have to put up so much cash or if they want it to abandon it which would leave a full ready to go production line in someone  elses possession?

I simple don't understand USA law where a stay can be done by putting up cash by the defendants?. Something doesn't add up.

https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:RoC0h8vnZd4J:https://historiccity.com/2016/staugustine/news/florida/injunction-against-whetstone-denied-57949 &cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=au

In regards to YOW IMO lack of information to holders - I think it is poor form and will bite us in the bum one way or another either as a company or as shareholders and value.