stefans strategy has always been to do a negative positive...

stefans strategy has always been to do a negative positive negative sandwich. His intentions are very clear though. Rag out on the Zip stock because he owns Afterpay. Go back far enough into his posts like I've done and you can see where he makes a decision to start trying to damage Zips brand. It's pretty dangerous stuff to be doing to be honest as I think there have been court cases.
Stefan got lucky on the Afterpay shareprice rise, good on him. He admits it's over 90 percent of his portfolio in some of his posts and didn't make a dime before Afterpay and is now a self confessed share expert guru, specialising in the bnpl sector.
He just got lucky like so many. And he has attempted to bring up all sorts of arguments to derail investors buying zip. And they've turned out to be all nonsense.

His credibility is shot to pieces. And hopefully he himself can eat a piece of humble pie now, realise his predictions on the failed integration with quadpay, that the diversified products would be the death of zip, businessexecutioj risk and lack of ability to forward quickly, the margin erosion argument with tap and zip; they have all been furphies aimed to damage Zips reputation and brand. They had no substance.
All the while Stefan was on the apt threads chanting for it to continue its rise and calling out zip as shit.