I'd like to see them use more reasonable and realistic language in their reporting.
Hyperbolic language is a red flag for me, especially after the spate of gold mining disasters by spruikers who led KIN, GCY, DCN and many others.
The language used here is similar - to many over-the-top hyperbole terms all grouped together, like "spectacular" (which the grades are clearly not), "High Grade" (which the majority are not), "outstanding" (which the results are not).
The results are good, but they are clearly not all the terminology that we have highlighted above.
Why can't they just get real, and be objective, and just say the grades and results are good, and prospective for further drilling.
I don't like to see this type of reporting, it's the language of spruikers and touts, and clearly not grounded and objective. This type of reporting is worrying.
What it does make me do, is go back and look at the mining history of the executives involved, and see if they have been associated with this kind of reporting before and whether those companies had problems as a result, like with the companies mentioned above. I'll do more research now. And I'll send the company this email, requesting they get-real with their reporting language and tone.
These results are good, and that's all they really had to say.
Gw
Expand
