When RMS reports highly anomalous results like in the annoucement they sometimes provide an uncut and cut intercept. I beleive the uncut intercept being reported uses all assays as they were reported by the lab. A cut intercept uses an upper limit calculated via statistics instead of the highly anomalous value. In the past they have used 50 - 200g/t Au. If they were to report a cut intercept for the recent intercept it may have been 1m @ 50g/t or 200g/t Au.
Please correct if wrong.
ann, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RMS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$2.05 |
Change
0.010(0.49%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.347B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $2.08 | $2.11 | $2.04 | $6.948M | 3.355M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 12337 | $2.05 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $2.06 | 4000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RMS (ASX) Chart |