When RMS reports highly anomalous results like in the annoucement they sometimes provide an uncut and cut intercept. I beleive the uncut intercept being reported uses all assays as they were reported by the lab. A cut intercept uses an upper limit calculated via statistics instead of the highly anomalous value. In the past they have used 50 - 200g/t Au. If they were to report a cut intercept for the recent intercept it may have been 1m @ 50g/t or 200g/t Au.
Please correct if wrong.
When RMS reports highly anomalous results like in the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RMS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.92 |
Change
0.030(1.59%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.194B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.94 | $1.95 | $1.92 | $7.450M | 3.862M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 72964 | $1.92 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.93 | 42195 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RMS (ASX) Chart |