Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Anning Was Right To Defend Himself, page-92

First 92 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
rememdium

6,045 Posts.

28

19/03/19

08:35

Post #: 37805055
Share

Originally posted by Rock57: ↑

Annings words are very raw and confronting however because people don't like what he says doesn't make it legal to assault him physically.

To condone breaking the law on that basis is to condone violence which is posters on this thread are doing and yet on other threads on the massacre the same posters are saying the white supremacists need to stop their violence.

This is the left wing mentality - Violence is OK when I say it is otherwise it isn't - and then they expect to be taken seriously.

Debate any issue as hard as you want - irrespective of the persons speech this is a case of a person was assaulted and they defended themselves - as is their right

Expand

Perhaps if people were not so complacent in history we wouldn't have the likes of Hitler etc ...

I have no issues with what happened to Anning. He is nothing more than a stain on humanity.
5 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

HotCopper Highlights: RIP to Botanix (for now); Droneshield new ATH; Trigg mystery halt

Week 28 Wrap: Tariff chaos back for some reason; CBA holds strong

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 017 – RBA holds the toppings

CWX

Carawine faces Fraser Range JV collapse as IGO moves to scrap partnership

LIS

'Opens doors': Li-S Energy the first Oz company to produce lithium metal foils

Trump just dropped a 200% tariff bomb. Here's how to cash in

AII

Inside the depths of Panasqueira: A legacy carved in rock

ILU

Rare earths stocks surge as Pentagon buys big stake in US REE miner

AAU

Antilles brings Chinese ally on board to keep Neuva Sabana work chugging on

VMM

'Big tick': Viridis positions for global leadership with Colossus pre-feasibility study

First 92 Last

SPONSORED BY