annoucement out, page-19

stockanalyst1

My statement "I agree with the latter" was strictly limited to the latter proposition i.e. "we should totally ignore Stockanalysis" and frankly I do not think that is an adverb too far having read some of what they have written on various stocks.

Am I correct in discerning from your post that you consider hot copper to be akin to a jury and therefore unqualified to offer anything of use? If that is correct may I be so bold as to ask why you use hot copper? I find it odd that many posters continually state the irrelevance of information posted on hot copper yet as yourself continue to do so. Please clarify if I have misunderstood.