Innocentcarbon,
"But could also be related to changes in thickness of the layers of rock in that area, like going from a less dense rock into a 'valley' filled with denser rocks like pyroxenite and nothing to do with IOCG deposits."
I would think the above statement is only relating to their relative densities. But CZN survey report is talking about their residual gravity. Assume the general area gravities of TUR and OD sites are similar, then the TUR's much higher residual gravity should have contained much heavier materials or higher concentrations of heavy materials.
May be I am wrong. Please comment your view.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.369M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 4408766 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3¢ | 30996836 | 26 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.21pm 15/07/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| CZN (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable