I think it is too early to say either way.
Large deposits are marginal at 200ppm U (0.02% U) so a 0.11% sample is not insignificant.
If for example a large shallow calcrete hosted deposit is found nearby with similar grades that would be a good result in my opinion.
announcement, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add E25 (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
20.0¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.44%) |
Mkt cap ! $43.98M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 20.5¢ | 21.0¢ | 20.0¢ | $13.12K | 64.11K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 485354 | 20.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 21.0¢ | 13766 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.56pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| E25 (ASX) Chart |