It's interesting if you analyse the number of announcements by...

It's interesting if you analyse the number of announcements by NuSep.

Year_________Number______Average Days between
2009_________81__________4.5
2010_________87__________4.2
2011_________80__________4.6
2012_________68__________5.4
to date2013___14__________8.0

In light of the "5 announcements in 2 weeks" prediction, in 2009 through 2011, one could reasonably have expected 3 or so announcements in a 2 week period. There were only 11 cases in the three year period where there was not a single announcement in a 2 week period.

We have not had an announcement in 53 days. There was not a single period in 2009-2011 where we went 53 days without an announcement, the maximum being 32 days. We did have a 66 day hiatus in 2013, with the break coming with the announcement of an independent director, elected only a few months prior, with no explanation.

So any 'guru' predicting 5 announcements in 2 weeks should have taken a look at history (I know some say we shouldn't look back) as this would have been a good guide that the 5 announcements was unlikely.

To be fair, those who make such predictions are not 'old hands' at NuSep, and probably believe that being spun by insiders at a company constitutes 'research'. When these insiders tell you "ignore the past and just look forward", there's probably some very good reasons to look into the past. In this case it is a VERY GOOD PREDICTOR of the future.

I suggest every shareholder current or potential, look closely at this company. If you believe in the IP, that's a good reason to dig deeper. I wish I had before I invested.

Good luck to all....we'll need it.