DSH 0.00% 35.5¢ dshe holdings limited

Another accounting stun! any clues?

  1. 370 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 72
    It is very sad to see when the financial report of DSH not only provides an inaccurate account of the company, but in fact attempts to inflate its profit. Who's accountable? Deloitte? Directors? Anchorage Capital? Government? Financial system?


    In my opinion, Dick Smith downfall was supposed to be predictable and be significantly reduced or avoided, if the accounting showed us the real picture of the firm, so CEO/the board and shareholders can steer the company in the right direction. I thought audit firm is supposed to provide tools for companies to make better decisions, not to fool its shareholders.  Deloitte may be forgetting about who actually paid for its fees?

    Does fellow hotcoppers have any clue about the accounting tricks that made DSH look so profitable, when in fact the business was going down???


    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Some information on the internet
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-01-...vate-equity-owners-greed-for-collapse/7069604

    Private equity group Anchorage Capital bought Dick Smith from Woolworths in 2012 for an initial payment of just $20m.

    Anchorage then "dressed the company up to look good for just one thing - to persuade people to buy shares," according to analysts from Forager Funds Management.

    Anchorage "wrote down the value of the inventory, took provisions for future onerous lease payments, wrote down the value of the plant and equipment and liquidated a lot of the inventory as quickly as they possibly could to throw off cash," according to Forager's Steve Johnson.

    The cash was then used by Anchorage to effectively make Dick Smith 'buy itself'.

    The writedowns inflated profits, a key factor in enticing investors into the company.

    For example: a stock item that may have been bought for $100 may have been in the books at $60 after the writedowns, which meant an extra $40 profit on every sale.

    The writedown of plant and equipment lowered depreciation charges, also boosting the bottom line.

    "But when they liquidated all that inventory to pay for the purchase price, they didn't replace it," according to Forager's Steve Johnson.

    "And the new owners of the business, since it's been listed on the stock market, have had to put in a lot more money to fund the increase in inventory."
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add DSH (ASX) to my watchlist

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.