Personally, I think that’s a salacious diversion. The point he hit in twice in the article was that FC provided 82% of BIG’s revenue and that BIG booked revenue even though customers had not agreed to pay.
AFR is substantially pursuing the bread and butter accounting standards issues and tossing in the guilt by association for a little click bait, IMO.
Another AFR article, page-229
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 672 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)