If the AFR article is to be believed, these guys are privy to the inner workings of the company. There were 4 or 5 trading days between the first article and suspension
From a behavioural view, if you knew it was dodgy and you knew it was going to start unravelling, you'd start selling at the very least some shares to lock in profits, especially when it rebounded from $1.60 to $2.48
I find it hard to reconcile that virtually none of them sold
BIG Price at posting:
$2.22 Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
