Looks like by the time they go commercial in 2016, NEA would have enough scale and cashflow to just beat them on price, coverage and service. Their product needs to be either revolutionary, or much lower cost to have any hope of taking any meaningful market share.
another geospatial imagery company, page-22
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)