Are you suggesting every person who consumes produced foods cultivated as such will get cancer?
That is your interpretation but will respond as below:
Will everyone die from cancer - no. Will thousands die from cancers related to food - yes, most definitely. Will the diagnosis be related to food - perhaps, perhaps not - most people don't necessarily question as to how they got it and neither will physicians - the latter interested in toxic treatment options.
Bear in mind that there are other ways we are given foods that are being tampered with - eg: via tins - where addition of certain substances are added via manufacturing processes.
There are also supermarket demands - though we're told it's consumer driven where certain 'look' and 'size' is more important than nutrition itself.
From your own report posted come another interesting point:
The best way to reduce pesticide contamination (and the harm it causes) in our environment is for all of us to do our part to use safer, non-chemical pest control (including weed control) methods.
Chemically based pesticides and herbicides kill a lot more than just a few bugs and perhaps aids organisms to evolve and even become immune thus demanding stronger substances to deal with. It's overuse can be likened to overuse of antibiotics and just see how that is going with a range of superbugs now becoming more prevalent.
There are better options. Do detect some toxicity in your responses but am thus far immune from such. You sound like a promoter for some of these products - perhaps reflect on the fact that people have been farming long before any chemical enhancements came to be and very successfully.
The following picture tells a great story and is self explanatory:
Notice the comments re strategically grazed livestock - yes, that cow, the same cow that is portrayed as evil by perhaps those evil themselves. Some cycles shouldn't be tampered with. AIMO
