I think there’s a reason she wanted to know who the trustee was. And there is the reason. We may never know but it was a very strange move putting the money into the “control” of someone else. That means someone close to her who is prepared to dish it out as needed. But protective trust. It’s odd !
Another Reynolds vs Higgins law suit!, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)