IMO if D C really had the interests of PRL fore most in his mind...

First 8 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
whatsup

10,725 Posts.

267

07/08/18

10:54

Post #: 34768197
Share

Originally posted by Fast&furious ↑

Mate are you speaking for DC or the majority of us here? Have you not been reading the posts here? Most of us here have invested for Uruguay project. Even if we are now a minority holder with 49% the majority of us here believe it should be the priority. It is not about emotion. The most logical and rational thing to do is get to the bottom of it. We should not be wasting time and money in new projects like Spain /Australia whilst leaving it to another loser partner SEI who bungled it up the first place. Stop continuing making excuses for DC saying it is out of our hands. It is truly out of our hands when we have zero interest in it. At the moment we are still holding 49%. We need to put all our efforts to bring it to fruition. If DC cannotvdonit get someone else we can. Instead just walk away and look for other shiny objects. Besides I thought it was the most exciting thing for the company for the last 5 years. It just doesn’t make any logical and business sense. We might be greedy but not stupid.

Expand

IMO if D C really had the interests of PRL fore most in his mind he would have sold the Spanish and Aust interests and applied the proceeds to completing what they started in Uruguay, Im betting that 60 % + shareholders of PRL would agree with this.

PRL Price at posting: 0.2¢ Sentiment: Hold Disclosure: Held
9 Upvote

3 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

The Rising Tide: How institutional adoption is shaping the future of crypto

CC9

Chariot locks in high-potential drill target at Black Mountain, one of the USA's largest lithium landholdings

TRE

Toubani raises $10M to see Mali's Koubada Gold Project through to DFS

HIQ

Mouthguard concussion sensor tech developer HIT IQ wins second US patent

SVL

Silver Mines pushing ahead with NSW Bowdens project despite green group setback over power lines