Surely any PENALTY for BHP pulling out of SC55 should be "Because they pulled out" AND NOT BE dependant on anything else, especially since the agreement seems to favour the company that may have put the service contract at risk in the first place. It isn't rocket science, and I would like to know the reasoning for this.
here here to that!
answers needed !, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add OEL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $57.54M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.2¢ | 1.2¢ | 1.2¢ | $9.013K | 751.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 9764560 | 1.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3¢ | 11448013 | 20 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| OEL (ASX) Chart |