Outstanding Antas South holes. This a summary for interest. To...

Outstanding Antas South holes. This a summary for interest. To get an idea of the prospectivity of the outstanding holes. Could they be good... or not.?

ARVD-160,162,164 are all tight clustered together at west end of 520m HGZ on a common Easting. However ARVD-158 which is in the middle of them has already been assayed and is not exciting ([email protected]%, incl 1m@2%). So I am not waiting on anything spectacular here.

ARVD-166, 168,169 are very close to the above, to the east of them, but getting into a better area, based on past results. It could be expected that these will give much the same results as those around them which are quite good, if unspectacular. These close-spaced holes add to jorc reserve mainly, in an area of known confidence.

ARVD-157, 159 significant drills to the west on common Easting. Pot luck, but kinda off-strike. Wild cat holes.

ARVD-163, 161 Further west from above two, on a common Easting. Gotta have a long shot.

ARVD-156 next to completed ARVD-154, but further south. ARVD-154 had a very good result from 70m-77m of around 6% . .. but it is further away from zone. Cannot expect much really.

ARVD-153,151 way over on the East side of the zone. Near ARVD-130 (no significant results) and ARVD-147 8m @0.15% from surface. So unless they turn up a bit more surface oxide which would be fine, there is nothing exciting at all.

ARVD-150 is close to 166,168,169. It is really only a hole for jorc confirmation. To the north of it is 148 (10m @0.28%) to the south is 152 (couple of 0.5m hits at 2%) So hardly exciting.

ARVD-167, 170 in the area of surface oxide so maybe add a bit more of that. Also maybe some good lengths of good old 1% at depth?

ARVD-171 Close to 152,154 Both have good assays.

Conclusion: To a large extent I think these holes are not exciting. Not to say the big westerly exploratories may not hit something extraordinary.... always on the cards I suppose. Mainly they appear to be for firming up a good jorc, which can only happen if you have close holes in a good area. There is not a lot of apparent consistency (at rough glance) so more drilling is a requirement.

All good and necessary drilling, but I am not hanging on to getting their results particularly. Probably they will be passed off (tucked away) in the more voluminous quarterly, but watch those 157,159,163,161 exploratories.

These are the only true unknowns... the rest can be guessed at.

http://www.avancoresources.com/pdfs/MassiveCopperSulphidesIntersectedAtRioVerde17Oct11.pdf

... page 5

Then again... the reason for the delay could be that some results are so darn good they have asked for a re-assay!!! One has to have a dream I suppose? ;) cheers