Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Why not address the facts of the discussion?I suppose the facts...

First 3 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
greystone

1,796 Posts.

258

07/12/19

14:18

Post #: 41849591
Share

Originally posted by sierra: ↑

Not the Heartland Institute again!

In the 1990s, the Heartland Institute worked with the tobacco company Philip Morris to attempt to discredit the health risks of secondhand smoke and to lobby against smoking bans.^[3]^[4]^:233–34^[5] Since the 2000s, the Heartland Institute has been a leading promoter of climate change denial.^[6]^[7] It rejects the scientific consensus on climate change,^[8] and says that policies to fight it would be damaging to the economy.^[9]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heartland_Institute
https://climateinvestigations.org/who-is-paying-for-heartland-institute-climate-denial-palooza/https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Heartland_Institute

Expand

Why not address the facts of the discussion?
I suppose the facts do not suite your agenda?
5 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

AII

Inside the Depths of Panasqueira: A Legacy Carved in Rock

Week 27 Wrap: 40% China tariffs?; ASX +10% FY25; US Amazon price spike

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

DMP

Is Domino's a steal after -25% plunge?

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

First 3 Last

SPONSORED BY