That's the big but so important difference between IVX and IMU....

That's the big but so important difference between IVX and IMU. IVX got a technology which is given to " contractors " / research partners to develop. We don't know what priority these guys put on IVX. At IMU the focus of all involved is 100% on their technologies. IVX is run by investors / business partners who obviously got no idea what needs to be done to get it into human trials, therefore the " Outsourcing ". At IMU the people running the show are the ones who got the in-depth knowledge.

I got hooked by the " Memory effect " stated almost 2 years ago or so and trusted IVX. Nothing is lost so far apart of the opppies but it looks almost impossible to get this one going. Anyway, the best way to recoup the oppie losses is to buy the heads at 0.1c. But even that is risky as I am sure when that happens the guys come up with the share consolidation of 1:10 or even 1:100 to do more CRs. The tech got something to it if they did not lie to us, but management so far was incompetent to progress it further at the speed required. IMU, despite hammered down by the market, shows how its done.

Currently not holding but will give it a go at 0.1c if the opportunity arises. This, atm, is an almost infinitily high-risk stock. Not impossible to make a few bucks but certainly not in the near future.

GLTA