Noodly,"Unapproved? Sorry but not interested in the rest of your...

  1. 24,221 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 34
    Noodly,

    "Unapproved? Sorry but not interested in the rest of your irrational rant. The TGA has approved 2 vaccines for use in Australia, thefizer/BioNTech vaccine.Oxford/Astrazeneca vaccine.18 June 2021 "There are strict protections in place to help ensure the safety of all COVID-19 vaccines. Before receiving validation from WHO and national regulatory agencies, COVID-19 vaccines must undergo rigorous testing in clinical trials to prove that they meet internationally agreed benchmarks for safety and effectiveness.As with all vaccines, WHO and regulatory authorities will continuously monitor the use of COVID-19 vaccines to confirm that they remain safe for all who receive them."


    Thanks for even more laughs!

    The TGA has NOT approved these injections, they merely have 'provisional use authorisation' which is the same as the U.S.'s 'emergency use authorisation'.

    https://www.tga.gov.au/covid-19-vaccine-provisional-determinations

    "Normally for a vaccine to be registered in Australia, a sponsor (usually a pharmaceutical company) is required to submit a complete and comprehensive package of data to the TGA. A formal evaluation is then carried out in multiple stages by technical experts, prior to a decision being made."

    Of course that's all BS as well cos here's what happened when a doctor asked for the relevant information vis a FOI request.

    https://tinyurl.com/pv7sc2zr

    "Australia’s Medicine Regulator has never seen Pfizer Covid Vaccine study data despite deeming it safe for Australians.

    A freedom of information request made to Australia’s drug regulator has revealed they have never seen the extremely limited study data for the Pfizer / BioNTech vaccine despite giving it emergency approval and deeming it safe to be injected into the arms of Australians. The reason for the request was due to concern over the validity and verifiability of Pfizer’s data given its legal history, a concern also shared by Peter Doshi in the BMJ in February, as well as the proven concerns over fraudulent data relating to Covid-19 as seen in the “Lancetgate” scandal of June 2020.The TGA originally attempted to surpress the FOI request by requesting a 6-month extension in view of the amount of work required to respond satisfactorily. The doctor complained to the Office of the Information Commissioner who instructed the TGA to respond by the 26th May, however they still failed to meet that deadline.Eventually the TGA responded producing a heavily redacted single study showing that the only investigation into the effects on the foetus was performed on 44 rats with no long-term data on the offspring. Their response also confirmed that they had never seen or requested the patient data from Pfizer and simply accept Pfizer’s report of their study as fact, despite their proven history of fraudulent claims."


    Or keep drinking the coolaide, your choice.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.