I can assure you I am not Trumbull or Trumble as a few posters on here can testify.
There aren't too many companies on the ASX that have their directors as heavily invested as Trumbull or Perrin.
What is eerie is you buying back into NAG (if that is the case) and having a daily bitch about them.
If NAG weren't up to your spec - why did you buy back in?
You can always throw you hat in the ring at the next AGM and turn everything around.
All we need to know is what you would do differently
I can assure you I am not Trumbull or Trumble as a few posters...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 90 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
