HM
Didn't see anything in there that the technical side of things is a dud - basically, to develop the field will require capital.
Is the concept of requiring capital to develop the resource a new one that did not exist before the entered the scheme with Santos?
When they wheeled out LNGN did they think that no capital was required?
No...this got too hard because they are not up to the job and are looking for the easy way out.
I am patient and don't like being taken for a fool. I particularly don't like being told that there are 'strong' reserve upgrades on the way (ie, already in the bag) and then when it suits, the furniture gets re-arranged to suit their new circumstances.
Some men grow into accountability others have it thrust upon them. It is now time for this crew to feel the latter.
I hope that ESG holders have the biggest you know whats to fill that grand room on the 28th - vote no and tell them well and truly before then.
It is a game....I don't think it is finished yet.
all the best gang
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ESG
- anxious parties?
anxious parties?, page-19
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ESG (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
JBY
JAMES BAY MINERALS LIMITED
Andrew Dornan, Executive Director
Andrew Dornan
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online