Anyone able to attend AGM, page-4

The passage you refer to was in the first of the recent Judgments:

63​

After dealing with jurisdictional matters, the adjudicator began his

substantive determination by considering a claim for $51,812.327.67 for
controlled blasting. The adjudicator set out cl 37.1 and cl 37.2 of the
General Conditions. After considering the parties' arguments, the
adjudicator determined that no amount was payable for controlled blasting
as NRW had already claimed $66,955,604.99 for controlled blasting and
the claim for the same work in Progress Certificate No 21 was a 'recycled​

claim'.

http://decisions.justice.wa.gov.au/...nts-WebVw/2015WASC0369/$FILE/2015WASC0369.pdf
So the 51m was determined 'not payable' for being duplicated or 'recycled' from another claim. What isn't clear to me is if the other claim is still 'live' and before adjudication.