I am surprised that in this case, where the IBA has a history of...

I am surprised that in this case, where the IBA has a history of corruption and lack of transparency, that you aremt more suspicious of the confidential testing they performed, but instead are focusing on vague sentences in the IOC statement?

Respectfully, this is what ive never understood about the Right, you can show them 30+ indictments and mutiple allegations of sexual assault and they will ignore the lot, but instead chose to zero in on something as banal as a laptop with porn on it and see it as a hammer blow.

This is pretty much the same, a known corrupt organization that is becoming the pariah of its sport makes a finding based on confidential tests it refuses to disclose, and you chose to believe it over the circumstantial evidence surrounding a human who has somehow lived their entire life as a female and never been questioned before.

Just doesnt make sense to me.