Welcome back Lazarus.
Pointy One is easy, your easier.
Let’s count down your best (not) posts to date.This is a hint, readers are not in awe of you, rather the complete opposite.
Also surprise surprise (I saw who like your post "Bill and Ben the flower pot men".
No 5 – Examples of your Delusions of Grandeur
Your Post on 21/08/19
“ Btw my thread hasreached 176k views!!!”
Another Your Post on 21/08/19
“Absolutely crazy thatthis thread has reached 176k views, in context I'm unable to find anotherthread in over a year to reach such numbers”.
Your Post on 21/09/19
“You might notbe think my questions are relevant but the number of views my threads attractssay otherwise. I have the most viewed thread in FBR HC history and my targetmarket is not people like you”.
Another Post on 21/09/19
“In less than 24hours this thread is approaching 3k views and this was started on a Fridaynight with the weekend been a less busier time than weekdays”.
Your Post on 05/10/19
“You do realisedI have the most viewed thread in FBR history which should tell you that mytarget audience is not the small time players who post on HC”.
Your Post on 06/10/19
"Actually theviews have progressively increased over time as two weeks ago I saw the viewsaround 160,000 but has now 200,000".
But it all come unstuck when I questioned you, Do you rememberyour post on 06/10/19
"The reason Imention the views because that poster asked who my posts are directed at.......Please read all posts before throwing out accusations".
Then in my post of 07/10/19I actually called you out (as an example) that your post on 21/09/19 had nothing to do with responding to a query raisedbyBocas Boy
*****
No 4 – Easy to critique others on working but you cannot prepare a simple model yourself
Your Post on 14/08/19
“Can someone please provide mewith a detailed analysis on Hadrian X:
(1) What is the anticipated cost to manufacture?
(2) How many people are needed to operate it?
(3) How many houses need to be built before you recover the capital outlay?
(4) How long does it take to build one? They have stated 100 robots would beneeded to build 50,000 houses.
This is the core product yet there is so many questions and I'm finding it hardto create a model that will forecast the cashflows in the long term”.
Syadyppah’s post on 15/08/19 nails it with the following
“24hrs on FBR thread and youhave asked the below questions. You may need to rethink your Avatarname........
Can anyone tell me if their core aim it to sell these machines or be a leaderin the construction industry?
What is the anticipated cost to manufacture?
How many people are needed to operate it?
How many houses need to be built before yourecover the capital outlay?
How long does it take to build one?
Does anyone know their game play?
Why the hell do they need an in house IP lawyer?
Honestly what are they doing to require so many people?
I wonder what the reliabilityof these machines will be like as $2m investment for it to break down in 5 years”
So you have the audacity to criticise a complicated analysisregarding whether the share price of a spec stock (FBR) is undervalued, yet,you can’t even apply put together a simple financial model for the companyusing both available information and information that you will have gatheredover all your years of experience.
******
No 3: Failure to understand the fundamentalbusiness model being pursued by FBR-
Firstly, some posts where you hold out to be some type of“expert”
Your Post on 16/08/19
“FYI- I'm havebeen directly involved in streamlining inefficient companies so I'm wellequipped to you when I see an elephant in the room”.
Another Post on 17/08/19
“I'm not a consultant I'mdirectly involved in the business decisions so that our investors get thereturns that is required”.
And another on 20/09/19
“Youdo realise I have been directly involved with start ups in the bay area? FBRtechnology doesn't impress me compared to some of things I have made decisionson”.
And another post on 02/09/19 where you infer you do yourhomework
“Before I makeany donations I ensure I read their financial statements”.
Yet with all this expertise, you demonstrate your inabilityto do simple research (that a fresh faced intern could have done) or you simplydidn’t get it when you posted on 14/08/19
“Can anyone tellme if their core aim it to sell these machines or be a leader in theconstruction industry? Or more specifically solely laying bricks!!”
*******
No 2: Re Appointment of CFO –
Your Post on 29/10/19:
“This useless CFO wasgiven the boot on 31/7/2019 and FBR didn't have this decency to informshareholders. Replaced by someone that looks like they're best mates with thePivacs and doesn't hold a CA/CPA”.
Gamblore’s perfect response
“Anotherbrilliant example of you not even reading announcements. Jun 3rd they announcedthat Aiden Flynn was to take on a new role in the Global Commercialisation Teamfocused on economic and financial modelling.
As for the new guy, he has two post gradsincluding one from FINSIA, and extensive experience. From someone who has theirCPA, if you think that is worthy of your focus, then you’re the one that has noclue”.
*******
Drum Roll Please ...............................
No 1: Application of DST
Your Post on 20/09/19
“Reason for invention: "I invented DST™ to solve the problem of stabilising a robot at theend of a long moving boom, originally for an application that didn't haveenough demand to justify its development cost."
My [ie. Connect the Dots] proposition:
… Personally from the publicly available information I would spin thebusiness into the healthcare sector where DST would be used for surgicalrobots”.
No explanation necessary on this last one, but no doubt yourbest work to date!!!!!!
(20min delay)