C'mon mate. You're a chemical engineer " much more related to climate science ". You clearly think you're superior to others that post on hc.
You said it yourself.
" Yes, I have done a lot of work on this. Far more than any alarmist on this site, all of whom refuse to debate the science presumably because they cannot understand it. Or are too lazy. "
You have selflessly dedicated your time and you are strangely giving the benefit anonymously in a chatroom rather than publishing it for the world to benefit from.
So no papers then ? No actual scientific study ? No documented research ?
How does that help your opinion carry more weight than all those lazy people then ? Those lazy people that just read the stuff the professionals produce.
You're starting to sound like Mudguts. All claims, no facts, diversion upon questioning.
More green and less brown doesn't mean there is more food necessarily. You are trying to simplify it for the popularist shockjock audience.
I'll stick to the cautious , much more studious science produced by people that are experts in their field who have publicly backed their opinion rather than by anonymous ' engineers ' who are throwing rocks somewhere.
