I appreciate the courtesy. Having established that the heat...

  1. 30,924 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 174
    I appreciate the courtesy.

    Having established that the heat isn’t being transferred from the atmosphere to the oceans, but the other way around, I now need to consider the issue that water vapour at the ocean surface is present at up to 25,000ppm, which is 60 times the current level of CO2 and 80 times that of a hundred years ago. Water is clearly the major IR forcer, so I’ll look for papers discussing the impact of an extra 100ppm of CO2 on the overall equation.

    In the meantime, do you have an opinion on aerial volcanic CO2, emissions of which have recently been shown to be at least a magnitude greater than previously estimated, and sub-sea volcanic activity, which, since people have actually started investigating them, are proving to be substantially larger than Gerhlach’s 1991 seminal paper on the issue?

    https://www.nature.com/articles/nature07075

    http://www.nbcnews.com/id/25419241/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/volcanoes-erupting-beneath-arctic-ice/#.XaY3jS9_WhD

    https://www.livescience.com/40451-volcanic-co2-levels-are-staggering.html

    https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2018GL079096

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311066468_Explanation_for_the_northern_Pacific_Blob
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.