appeal., page-4

oz, the appeal last day was last Friday the 7th, the day the council voted to go for it.

Council feels that there were flawed decisions about water catchment and that 'even CRC had admitted errors'.

Looks to me that the legal arguments are to be tested to see if this should go to arbitration: privity clause or no.

"The principle of privity in the common law's law of contract dictates that an individual cannot sue on a contract to which he or she was not a party. A common example of the principle in operation is that if A (a consumer) buys goods from B (a retailer) which B had originally bought from C (the manufacturer) which turn out to be faulty, A cannot sue C in contract law because A has no contract with C."

I believe a couple of Greenie councilors are using rate payers money to fund this. I wonder what the feeling is in Braidwood right now?