Terry - my understanding is that it is not the original 2002 JVA with its $300,000 earn-in period that is in contention - but the variation to that agreement made on 29/9/2004 requiring $450,000 to be spent before 30/10/2005.
No party would agree to an extension to a contract that had not been fulfilled, or had lapsed, if they had knowledge that their asset had the potential to be worth much more than a 75/25 share. Even the expenditure of $40m+ by Q pales into insignificance compared to what the asset is suspected to be worth
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGS
- appeals case
appeals case, page-100
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AGS (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online