appeals case, page-77

Oh, have just re-read HH's conclusions in those March 2012 orders - and it would appear that, tho' not used then, certain "contentious" affidavits have been provided, resulting in HH's view that:

"There was considerable disputation about the role of affidavit evidence. I have had regard to that evidence principally to be satisfied that Alliance has reason to believe that there are documents held by Quasar and/or Heathgate which directly touch upon the prospectivity of the Paralana Plains area." ...

In the absence of those documents will affidavits be sufficient proof, I wonder.