GDay MD ... I think we need to be clear that the MD&C case objective is about regaining the 75% that was allegedley taken for less than fair value by Heathgate et. al.
The squabble is not about adjusting the costs to look something more like AGS think they should be... the last time I looked the difference was 2 shackles and a three pence offset in part by the CPI escalation. I honestly doubt AGS have the foggiest as to what the real costs are...equally, I have no doubt that Heathgate et.al are gouging ... because they can.
The MD&C will decide how much of the spoils goes where IMO.
I also think that sisy made some good comments earlier about the abscenece of agent / principal relationships... but again I would caution as that propbably has a time limit around it also...
all good ... or probably closer to the truth ... not worse at least!
have a good one
appeals case, page-92
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 21 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)