Hi ncarr,
If I've interpreted the first question right, I think you'll find that it is in fact P&G who is required to provide OBJ minimum funding including R&D expenditure to maintain the commercial exclusivity granted to P&G under the PDA.
In regards to your 2nd question I share a similar view to you. To my understanding OBJ receives a licensing fee for each new 'territory', milestone payments on predetermined targets, and of course royalties as a percentage on wholesale units sold.
I wouldn't expect to see revenue earnings for OBJ above $2m in this financial year, however multiple product global launch campaigns executed by P&G will be far more difficult to miss, and I think the market will be awoken by this event in the not too distant future.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- Appendix 4C
Appendix 4C, page-103
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 47 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, Managing Director & CEO
Charles Armstrong
Managing Director & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online