Walbrook, strange, don’t you think, that you allege climate change deniers apparently use logic and critical thinking skills to form their opinion.
given that what they’re denying is climate science, it’s strange deniers don’t use evidence and data to form their views.
you see the only things that beats science is better science
that being the case, how could denier pseudoscience possibly over rule climate science, which is data driven and evidence based.
so, lacking a scientific base to their position, all climate change deniers can realistically do is spout their noisy opinions, which aren’t science. This explains why so many posts by deniers on HC climate threads rely on nothing more than Because I Said So.
Walbrook, people who accept science couldn’t give a rats about the opinions of deniers as they are of zero consequence.
