FAR 2.91% 50.0¢ far limited

Aqua Please Come Back - all reply to show support, page-11

  1. 454 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 107
    JujuM,

    You sum up the entire situation with your use of one word - respect. Or more accurately the lack of respect that has been given to Aqua specifically and many posters in general.

    Any person who, inter alia:

    1. has the conviction to "go all in" on a company;
    2. provides a daily up-date on relevant news for that company;
    3. collates all the information they can get their hands on and then shares it in drop-box;
    4. communicates with the senior management of the company;
    5. reaches out to the major shareholder (and obtains approval for their correspondence to be posted on HC);
    6. contributes a (large) number of posts each day on a number of forums;

    in my humble opinion deserves great respect.

    Aqua, you sir, have my great respect.

    Regardless of my great respect for Aqua, I do not always agree with what he posts. However, and more importantly, his views add to my thinking about FAR which in the end will (hopefully) allow me to make better decisions in relation to my investment in this company.

    As is relevant today, the "un-risked" numbers have always caused me concern. However, I have never sought to denigrate Aqua for presenting them because, despite my concerns, they show what things may look like if everything went perfectly. That is they place an absolute, albeit theoretical, cap on the value of FAR. And is based on the number of shares issued today to calculate a value per share. The number of shares on issue must increase to fund future development. How many and when these new shares will be issued is unknown. Accordingly, in absence of a better number taking account of additional shares being issued, the number of shares on issue today have been used. And many posters will disagree with this approach. Fine. But please provide an alternative analysis so that readers can consider both sides of the argument. Calling someone or implying that they are an idiot or stupid is not productive or helpful - even if it makes you feel better.


    Whether or not Aqua returns is ultimately his decision but I suspect he won't if he feels that he will not be treated with respect. And this forum will, for the reasons I have outlined above, be the poorer.

    Anyway, please try to be respectful to all posters. That said, I acknowledge that some people just can't help themselves and ask that others avoid the "bait".

    PS: I wish I had the conviction to follow Aqua on #1 in my list above. But I don't.....

    Regards,

    BSP
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add FAR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
Last
50.0¢
Change
-0.015(2.91%)
Mkt cap ! $46.20M
Open High Low Value Volume
51.0¢ 51.0¢ 50.0¢ $13.38K 26.64K

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
1 99993 50.0¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
51.0¢ 314682 3
View Market Depth
Last trade - 15.44pm 08/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ?
FAR (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.