This looks like being a critical newpaper article.
Why would GoG be nominating a judge for the arbitration process if they were not compelled to go to arbitration?
In other words, GoG continuing with processing the exploitation application by GGG does not negate GGG's right to activate arbitration.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ETM
- Arbitration or GoG finalising M/L The next chapter.
Arbitration or GoG finalising M/L The next chapter., page-45
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 50 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ETM (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
2.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $30.99M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
2.2¢ | 2.2¢ | 2.2¢ | $6.809K | 309.4K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 161 | 2.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
2.3¢ | 99184 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 161 | 0.022 |
2 | 577254 | 0.021 |
2 | 2384005 | 0.020 |
7 | 1677772 | 0.019 |
3 | 1949857 | 0.018 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.023 | 99184 | 1 |
0.025 | 290329 | 7 |
0.028 | 1463126 | 3 |
0.029 | 120000 | 1 |
0.030 | 44154 | 2 |
Last trade - 15.58pm 12/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ETM (ASX) Chart |