ETM 4.76% 2.2¢ energy transition minerals ltd

Arbitration or GoG finalising M/L The next chapter., page-70

  1. 1,387 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 356
    It appears GGG case for arbitration is derived from the exploration license standard terms.

    The mineral resources act however states that any dispute must be taken to Greenlandic courts.

    Part 1
    General rules
    (4) Decisions regarding matters falling within the scope of this Greenland Parliament Act may be appealed only to the courts having jurisdiction in Greenland. A decision appealed to the courts must be brought before the Court of Greenland as the court of first instance.

    https://govmin.gl/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Unofficial-translation-of-unofficial-consolidation-of-the-Mineral-Resources-Act.pdf

    I would consider the exploration license is subordinate to the Minerals Resources Act.

    This confirms what Naaja Nathanielsen has stated in the past and is more than likely the reason GoG is happy to take it to the Arbitration court.

    "I can state that Greenland Minerals has repeatedly stated that they do not believe that the uranium ban concerns them, and they are welcome to have that interpretation clarified in a courtroom, which must, however, be settled on Greenlandic land under Greenlandic law, writes Naaja H. Nathanielsen in a written reply to Sermitsiaq.AG."

    https://sermitsiaq.ag/naaja-greenland-mineralsmaa-stille-i-groenlandsk-retssal
    Last edited by ttroy: 29/05/22
 
watchlist Created with Sketch. Add ETM (ASX) to my watchlist
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.