I think this needs its own thread, but follows from a comment made by SirKnight and is right on the money with regards to the key question. Do we have any firm indication that Silex owned technology is being used in ARC or PRISM? If Silex is in fact a critical factor for the recovery programs, and recovery is the way forward (which i tend to think is correct), then why was the announcement of slowing the pace of U enrichment progress "unexpected" (as per Silex announcement today). Would the Silex management and board not be fully aware of the potential of the recovery process, its cost benefits over U mining and enrichment, and therefor know full well that recovery is likely the better path and enrichment likely to stall? Or, and i fear, is there some way that Silex is being cut out of that process and GLE think they can go alone on it? Conversation starter!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SLX
- ARC and PRISM
ARC and PRISM
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SLX (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$4.21 |
Change
-0.040(0.94%) |
Mkt cap ! $997.2M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$4.35 | $4.35 | $4.19 | $1.622M | 382.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 10180 | $4.20 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$4.22 | 3000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 10000 | 4.200 |
2 | 1814 | 4.190 |
2 | 2258 | 4.180 |
2 | 758 | 4.170 |
1 | 258 | 4.160 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.250 | 5258 | 2 |
4.260 | 258 | 1 |
4.270 | 258 | 1 |
4.280 | 258 | 1 |
4.290 | 258 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SLX (ASX) Chart |