Once again you’re making an assumption that I’m critical of the science.
I’m not one of those drongos who criticises the measurements used.
I was only pointing out that the graph offered up was based on a tiny window of time, how do you get from this to the point of suggesting that I doubt the measurements?
Alert but not alarmed, how do you take this bit to a point that suggests that I say we sit on our hands and do nothing? If we are Alert to a possible problem this should suggest that we should be monitoring the potential problem and as such how could you possibly think I support the idea of ignoring it?
Your belief that the graph highlights a critically changing part of the earth’s environment is an opinion not a fact. Take the word “critical “ out and your 100% correct, climate is a dynamic system and a worthwhile subject for humanity to improve our understanding of.
