I don't know I think they are drawing a long bow with some of those assumptions, I would like to see less assumptions and more proof, I get the theory sort of this goes here, that goes there, so this indicates that on some level it makes sense, could be 2 events and they have narrowed down some primary feeder zones.
I like the story but when I look to the one hole which can validate it hole 182 it had crap all gold in it, they stuck the result down the bottom and highlighted the previous result, 0.8 g/t is a pretty big step down from 1000 g/t, they are calling it a continuation I am not buying that.
We will see you were right about IVR I was dead wrong there, I might be wrong again on this one aswell, speaking off you got any idea when that 600m hole is coming in?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
