The attitude of the elitist liberals in the USA is to justify disarming their citizens by saying that Justice will protect.
If a family member is shot dead by a criminal then they say let the wheels of Justice prosecute the villain and punish him. This is the rule of law, they claim.
The argument that if a family member had have had a gun to protect themselves from the criminal falls on deaf ears. No, the citizen is obliged to allow themselves to be murdered in order to allow the elite liberals to have their superior way.
Now if the elitists crusade had a plan to disarm criminals then citizens may listen but the criminals scream "discrimination" so the elitists shift their focus to disarming the "white" population.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Are gun laws redundant?
Are gun laws redundant?, page-22
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 91 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)