What seems interesting to me is the killer said she, he, whatever, wanted to die, had to die in messages.
Lets assume this message is a actual depiction of the mindset of the killer. If so why kill kids at a school?? How is that relevant.??
Looking at other articles just appearing it seems the killer was possibly a ex-student , if not indeed was a ex-student thus a connection. This becomes relevant factoring in the killers age.
The important thing here is the killer was not a baby boomer nor received the privileges of a baby boomer due to the end of Bretton Woods in 1971. Some articles are claiming the killer was 28 years old. That is almost two full generations from the baby boomers and their wealth and privilege.
So the killer was 28 years old and possibly left school arguably maybe ten years ago where before she possibly spent nearly half his/her/whatever life in school. Life did not seem to work out while in the twenties but the killer did not receive the benefits of being a baby boomer . The anger of the killer seem directed at the school where she spent possibly nearly half their life.
How many old people are involved in mass school killings where they have lived more life beyond school??
Does this generational problem mean mass school killings are the indirect result of the end of the gold standard in 1971 causing mass asset inflation and stagflation giving the baby boomers a free ride at the expense of other generations resulting in mass school shootings in USA to ramp up??
